
|
Jesusalone was not satisfied with his interpretation of my response above.
When I write a response, my primary intention is to address the specific issue on the board. Granted, there may well be a multitude of peripheral issues in the question or challenge, and I may address some of them, but my focus is on the issue that prompted my correspondent to write. I believe it would be helpful when reading what I write to keep the target issue in mind. As I understood the issues, the writer was commenting on something I had written about spiritual contentment and asking readers to pray for her marriage. Her request for prayer needed no response other than those those who read her post pray in his behalf. I chose to address her comment about spiritual contentment. I wanted her to know that I had been and was living in a situation similar to her own, that I was writing from my own experiences. That is why I provided the example of my wife’s involvement with the black hole of Catholicism. It was not my purpose to pass judgment on the writer or her husband, as Jesusalone appears to have done in his out-of-context evaluation of what I wrote.
That is not at all what the verse means. Jesusalone here cites words from Paul’s second letter to the church at Corinth:
These verses are from a passage treating on man’s reconciliation to God, which includes verses 12 through 20 of that chapter. In verse 16, the Apostle is explaining that, since his conversion, he no longer evaluates people by measuring them against external, worldly or human standards. From his words we can see that his appreciation of Christ is no longer founded on those fallible worldly standards. In verse 17, Paul writes of the new birth, or regeneration, which changes sinful man into something significantly more excellent. Once regenerated, his former beliefs, values, priorities, loves, plans, etc., disappear. This is not to be understood that the new creation has no flaws; that he is perfect. Sin and evil are still there, but he now views them differently and they no longer control him. He now perceives things spiritually and no longer lives for worldly things but for eternity.
In the next verse, we are reminded that everything having to do with the regeneration of fallen man are of God. There is no indication that man must or can do anything in the process; certainly nothing that suggests that man must choose to believe. It appears, therefore, that even saving faith is a gift from God, not an elective act on the part of man. Our part in the salvific process comes after regeneration; and that is to serve Him by proclaiming a desire to be reconciled to God. Jesusalone then enters the easily misinterpreted world of prophecy:
The words Jesusalone cites here are from the book of Revelation, from a larger passage dealing with things to come during the Tribulation:
“Come out of her….” Who is “her?” Jesusalone appears to identify “her” with the Roman Catholic Church. Mama Church has few more committed enemies than me. I consider the RCC to be more than apostate. I consider it to be a cult, a pagan cult that denies the true Christ of Scripture and instead worships a pantheon of gods and demigods, things and ideas. I do not, however, believe that she is “Mystery Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and of the abominations of the Earth.” (Revelation 17:5). It may well be that she is a precursor of the Harlot but, then, so might some other religious system perhaps not yet with us. Chapter 17 of Revelation sketches the judgment on the Great Harlot, the apostate religious system that will exist in the Tribulation period. The unbelieving professing church will enter into the Tribulation (Revelation 2:22 and 3:10) and morph into a monster religious system dominated by the Great Harlot. Jesusalone continues:
I could not agree more that worshipping (latria) the cookie god in the Eucharistic celebration called the Mass is idolatry. Certainly the worship (hyper dulia) tendered to Catholic Mary and/or any of the multitudes of Catholic demigods (dulia) called saints violates God’s clear command to have no other gods before Him:
Chapter 18 of Revelation, from which Jesusalone drew his proof text, describes the fall of Babylon the Great, which is that false religious system established by the False Prophet to worship the Beast. In the verse cited by Jesusalone, God seems to be calling the Tribulation saints to leave the false religious system. Or He may be calling the elect to abandon the world system and come to faith in the Savior. Jesusalone had more to say:
I am concerned when people choose to speak for God, to tell us what He will do, unless they care able to provide clear exegesis of specific Scriptural passages that support their prophetic statements. While I agree that our Lord has the power even to regenerate lost souls who are active in the Catholic Church, I cannot agree with Jesusalone’s declaration that the Holy Spirit certainly would bring such persons out of that cult in a short time. While that seems to be quite likely, I can think of at least one reason that He might choose to leave a person where he is for more than a short time. Not having the prophetic vision or ability to know what God will do in such a situation, I can consider that the Holy Spirit might leave a person to tarry in the Romish cult in order to use him and his new faith as a catalyst to reach others who also are sinking in the muck of Catholicism. But what do I know? I have never claimed to speak God’s oracles. I also believe that it is not possible for any person to know absolutely the eternal state of any other person; to declare with certainty that a person is or is not saved. Jesusalone then provided his understanding of God’s pending judgment.
I have devoted a lot of time to reading and studying the Scriptures, but I cannot recall ever having read in them that God will judge organizations. It is my understanding that all souls ever created will one day be called before the Great White Throne
How wonderful that believers need have no fear of standing before the Judgment Seat of Christ:
Jesusalone’s words strongly suggest to me that he believes the apostate Catholic Church to be the Great Harlot of Revelation 17:5
Is Jesusalone correct in his assessment? I think not. I have no love for the Roman Catholic Church, which I believe to be apostate. However, I believe that, while it is easy to link her with the Great Harlot by carefully choosing proof texts, I do not believe that she is. That false religious system will be led by the False Prophet, or second beast, who cannot be the leader of the Roman Catholic cult in this time. The False Prophet is fully described in Revelation 13, verses 11-17.
In that the second beast, or False Prophet, rises up out of the ground, clearly a reference to Palestine, he must be a Jew. Since only God can restore life, he cannot be a resurrected individual. He will be influential in the religious arena and will be motivated by Satan (dragon). He cannot be Satan, for we know from Revelation 9:11 that Satan is “the angel of the bottomless pit.” Revelation 9:17 does not teach that the leader of the unholy empire arose from the abyss, but rather that it was brought about “from the abyss,” or by Satan. The current leader of the Catholic Church is German, and his predecessor was Polish.
In this verse we see that the False Prophet exercises authority delegated to him by the “power of the first beast.” He will promote worship of the first beast and to compel all the earth to worship the first beast as God.
In these verses we see that his ministry will be authenticated by signs and miracles, evidently proving to the masses that he is Elijah that was to come. And he succeeds in deceiving the unbelieving world.
The worship that he will promote will be idolatrous, and he will have the power to compel men to worship the beast.
He will have such authority in the economic arena that he will be able to control all commerce. I am not aware that the Roman Catholic Church or its leader possess the great powers described above, so it would seem inappropriate to label that apostate and idolatrous community as the Whore of Babylon. Jesusalone had more words of judgment to pass along:
Am I alone is noting inconsistency here? Jesusalone argues that we should “be guided by God’s word alone and not by what we may or may not be able to perceive in someone.” He then goes on to describe perceptions of the behavior of others that “can mean nothing else but that the person in question” is still on the wide path that leads to destruction. Am I alone in seeing here a clear parallel to the “do as I say, not as I do” religious position of the Pharisees? (Matthew 23:13) I urge a careful reading of Matthew 23. The idea that one might act in God’s name and sit in judgment over all those who fail to live up to one’s personal interpretation of God’s can be alluring. In my Pentecostal days, it was easy for me to judge as unsaved anyone who did not worship as I did. It was years before I came to fully accept that God is inscrutable, as are His ways, and for me to place arbitrary limits on His grace or mercy was inappropriate. While it is true that Scripture tells us the saints will judge all things, it does not declare that we have the power or authority to adjudge the eternal state of another:
The above is from a passage wherein Paul remonstrates with the church at Corinth because someone had sued another member in a secular court. Scripture tells us that the saints will assist Christ to judge the world in the Millennial Kingdom (Revelation 2:26-27, 3:21; Daniel 7:22). The Apostle argues that the members of the church are more than qualified with the truth, the Holy Spirit, gifts and other resources they have in Christ to settle small matters that arise among themselves. It should be noted that the Greek word translated as “judge” angels may alternately be translated as “rule” or “govern.” This strongly suggests that the saints will have some authority over holy angels, since angels are “ministering spirits” to serve the saints ((Hebrews 1:14). The fate of fallen angels already has been determined. Jesusalone provides an example of his ability to find things in his reading that are not mentioned in the material:
There is nothing in my original post to suggest that the person to whom I responded was the husband of an unsaved wife, yet Jesusalone has used his special powers to ascertain that the wife was the weaker vessel and, therefore, the one unsaved in that marriage. The question to which I responded was written by a woman, whose marriage was in trouble due to her husband's steadfast allegiance to the Catholic Church. An example of how easy it is to judge wrongly based upon one’s own preconceptions. The advice to pray for the partner still clinging to the empty promises of Catholicism parallels my own suggestion to help the writer find spiritual contentment and the partner to come out of the Catholic Church:
Jesusalone closed with this mantra:
Certainly, Jesus made possible the salvation of fallen man through His ministry and substitutional sacrifice; however, I believe that statement to be excessively simplistic. I believe it more accurate to say that salvation is by grace along, through faith alone, by Christ alone. Once again, I wish to make it clear that even saving faith is a gift from our Sovereign God and not something that fallen man comes up with on his own. A more complete summary of the Reformers’ foundational beliefs is included in the “Five Solas:” Sola Gratia (by grace alone); Sola Fide (by faith alone); Solus Christus (by Christ alone), which are self-evident. To these are added Sola Scriptura (by Scripture alone), which refers to the Scriptures as our only source of God’s doctrine; and Soli Deo Gloria (all glory is due to God alone). In closing, I should like to make clear two realities:
And that is all that I have to say on this matter. |