
|
For many years, I have been reading Catholic theology/mythology in an effort to better understand how that cult functions and what it believes. The more I read, the more confused I get. I often have read that the doctrine of the RCC is derived from three basic sources: Scriptures, tradition and the teaching authority of the Magisterium. According to my understanding of what I have read, the Magisterium is the sole authority within the RCC for interpreting Scripture. I have asked how Catholics might know with complete assurance what constitutes the body of tradition that the Magisterium uses to determine what is to be taught within the RCC. I have asked if there is a Canon of Tradition. I do not recall reading a response pointing to an authoritive source for such information. My research took me to the Chaplet of Mercy and the claimed appearance of Jesus to Sister Faustina Kowalska, beatified by John Paul II and known in the RCC as the Apostle of Divine Mercy. I read several reports and studies, all from Catholic sources, and my confusion mounted. According to Faustina's diary, Jesus appeared to her in 1931. She received from Him a message of mercy that she was told to spread throughout the world. She was asked to become the apostle and secretary of God's mercy, a model of how to be merciful to others, and an instrument for reemphasizing God's plan of mercy for the world. He told her to paint an image, gave her instructions for a feast whereby sins might be forgiven, dictated prayers, a Novena and other writings for Faustina to enter into her diary. In 1931, she “offered” herself for the lost and the Lord, according to her diary, responded with these words: "I am giving you a share in the redemption of mankind. You are a consolation to Me in the hour of My death." In her diary, she wrote:
Jesus announced to her a new feast, to be celebrated the first Sunday after Easter -- the Feast of Divine Mercy. When Jesus gave this Feast to Faustina, He reportedly told her:
Having shared all that, I ask Catholic readers to consider these questions: 1. Are Faustina's writings, allegedly dictated by Jesus, considered Scripture or tradition? 2. If Scripture, are they now considered part of the Canon of Scripture? 3. If tradition, are they now considered part of the Canon of Tradition, if there is such a compendium? 4. Who determined the nature of Faustina's diary? 5. Sister Faustina is called the Apostle of Divine Mercy. How does this Apostolic appointment correspond to the Apostolic appointments of the Twelve? 6. As I understand RCC doctrine, all sins are forgiven and a person enters a state of grace at baptism. Future mortal sins cause a person to lose grace and that cannot be restored except through the sacraments of Confession or Extreme Unction. Why does the special forgiveness of the Feast of Divine Mercy require Confession and Communion in order that sins be forgiven? Is this a conflict in doctrine? 7. According to the diary, Jesus promised eternal security to all who venerate the image He inspired Faustina to paint. Does not such veneration constitute idolatry? 8. The Bible tells us that when Christ returns for His bride, it will be announced with a shout and the sound of a trump (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17). In Matthew 24, we are told of the great tribulation that is to precede Christ's Second Coming, and that when He does come, the entire world will know it. Since the Church has not been raptured and the entire world has not seen Christ returning in glory, what authenticates His reported visitation to Faustina? 9. According to the "inspired" writings in her diary, the Lord gave Faustina a share in the redemption of mankind. Does this place her in a position comparable to, albeit of inferior status, that of Mary? Is she, together with Mary, a co-redemtrix with Jesus? 10. Among non-Catholics there are well-known media personalities who claim to have visited with Jesus in a manner similar to that described by Sister Faustina. Every orthodox or conservative Christian I know, and those I have read, consider these claims to be specious. What is the difference between a non-Catholic media minister's claim of direct Divine revelation and that claimed by Faustina? Things to think on. |
![]()
| Home | Weird Stuff | Catholic Stuff | PTG Forum | ![]() |