|
For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points {tempted} like as |
The Question: Please read Hebrews 4:15. I would like to know what it means. Was Jesus tempted in his flesh in every aspect. Did Jesus feel the same emotions and the same feelings as we do. Did his body contain the same sin nature that we have in our body. My Response: In order to properly grasp the meaning of Hebrews 4:15, it is necessary first to understand three fundamental points: 1) the meaning of the Greek word peirazo, which usually is translated to tempt; 2) The sense in which God may be tempted; and 3) that it was the humanity of Christ that was tempted, not His Deity. Before getting into the word study, I think it may be well to examine the nature of God. We read in Scripture that God is spirit (John 4:14); that He is All-powerful (Jer 32:17, 27); that He is All-knowing(I John 3:20); and that He is wise (Acts 15:18). We know He is gracious, merciful, long-suffering and merciful; that He is good. (Psalms 145:8,9) He can be angered, and His wrath is terrible to contemplate (Deut 32:22). These are but a few of the things He has revealed to us of His being and nature. We never see Him as being sneaky, malevolent, capricious or perverse. On the contrary, "The LORD is righteous in all his ways, and holy in all his works." (Psalms 145:17). If we accept the nature of God as revealed in Scripture, we need to look at the concept of a "sin nature." I am fundamentalist in my theology. I seek to receive God's word as He intended it to be received. I reject modern efforts to secularize religious practice and am solidly against adding to, or "enhancing the meaning of," what our Lord caused to be written down so many years ago. I do not believe modern scholarship can find "new" meanings that have lain hidden in Scripture until discovered by "special insights" or "revelation knowledge." It has been my experience that all these "new" understandings actually are nothing more than resurrections of the Gnostic heresies of the earliest days of the Church. These heresies were dealt with when they first surfaced, but they continue to be raised up by members of each new generation of "specially anointed" teachers, preachers and evangelists. About this "sin nature" thing: are Christians by nature corrupt and unable not to sin? I say that is not true. Before he is saved, when he is dead in sin, I daresay no man can avoid sinning. We are born in sin and, without Christ, the willingness to engage in sinful behavior or thoughts seems ever present. In that sense, it may be rightfully said that it is man's nature to sin. Paul made that clear in Romans 3:10; "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one." I do not, however, believe it accurate to say that is the case with those who have been redeemed by God's grace through faith in Christ. Certainly, it is difficult to live a righteous life. Though we are reborn and eternally forgiven, and the righteousness of Christ has been imputed to us, the 'Old Man,' our sinful flesh, lives on. It is this flesh that is home to what remains of our sinful nature, and there is continual striving in each of us between the old ways of the flesh and the eternal ways of our new life. Paul described the ongoing battle between his will and his spirit in his letter to the church at Rome:
We are made in God's image (Gen 9:16), by our Lord God, who is wise, all-knowing, all-powerful, righteous and good. We must accept that our God is not perverse, capricious, wicked or corrupt, for the revealed attributes of His nature make such impossible. Did God make a mistake when He created man? Or did He create us for torment and perverse pleasure, to be dumped in a burning lake of fire when He tires of playing with us? To argue that the Christian has a sin nature is to argue that God either is imperfect in His ability to create, or that He is a wicked and evil being Who derives perverse pleasure from tormenting the little creatures He whipped up for His pleasure. I do not believe this is how God is, for what we know of Him from His word paints an entirely different picture. If Christians have a sin nature, it therefore must not be possible for us to avoid sin, yet Scripture tells us we will never be tempted beyond our ability to resist.
This being so, why is it that the issue of “our sin nature” is so often raised from Christian pulpits? It may be that the idea of the sinful nature of the flesh somehow is transmitted to the regenerated believer is considered useful, for a variety of reason, by many who profess the Christian faith. One reason that springs to mind is that, by claiming we have a sin nature, we are able to rationalize our sinful ways. After all, if it is our nature to sin, then why try to avoid it? Since we are naturally sinful, then there is no need to feel remorse for doing "what comes naturally." I submit the concept of a sin nature is nothing more than a cop out to help Christians avoid taking responsibility for the sinful things we do. I do not believe that spiritual man has a sin nature, though natural man surely does. In that Jesus of Nazareth, our God become Man, was not born of the seed of a man, born without the stain of original sin, He could not have had a sin nature. Was Jesus tempted? Did He feel the same stirrings and urges as us? Scripture clearly tells us He was fully and completely man, tempted in all the ways men are tempted.
In Word Pictures in the New Testament, Volume V, A. T. Robertson explains how Hebrews 2:17 is to be understood in these words:
Vine's Expository Dictionary defines Peirazo, the Greek word translated "tempted" in the Hebrews passage above with these additional comments:
Why don't we live as we should? After all, we do have the guide book for righteous living, God's holy Word. The answer is, I believe, a simple one: Because we are disobedient. The true believer has free moral agency (the ability to choose), and has full control over those choices. God made that clear to Cain in Genesis 4:7: "If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him." It is tough to live a righteous life, but not impossible. Paul points this out in 1 Corinthians 10:13:
To sum it all up: I believe man bears the stain of Adam's sin and is weak when it comes to avoiding sin. I do not believe that Christians have a sin nature, but that we have free agency, which we too often exercise to make sinful choices. I believe we are not doomed to fall into sin, because God has promised never to allow us to be tempted beyond our ability to resist. I believe Jesus was fully man and that, as such, He was exposed to the same temptations as are all men. However, I do not believe He carried the sin of Adam. and I do not believe He ever yielded to temptation. He was tested, tempted and likely felt hormonal stirrings ...but He never gave in. Because He experienced the same temptations, in His flesh, as we do, He can sympathize with our anguish and go before our Father in our behalf.
These are the results of my hurried study. I hope they are of some use to you. Even if my words seem correct to you, I do urge you to do as the Bereans and search the Scriptures to see that what I write is truth. Better yet, take your questions before our Lord, and ask Him to guide your studies. |
![]()
| Home | More Questions | Catholic Stuff | PTG Forum | ![]() |