
|
After reading an article that addressed the Catholic Church's self-serving approach to interpreting the Scriptures, I decided to take a closer look at the process. For my project, I chose a subject that should be familiar to church-going Catholics—Saint Raphael. This Romish demigod is both saint and angel and has a feast day or days, an Office, a chaplet, a novena and a bunch of pre-written prayers. The Internet abounds with offers of the various kinds of saint stuff that Catholics seem to be fond of. There are little resin statues of Raphael suitable for mounting on the dashboard of one's car. Of course, there are St. Raphael medals and beads, but my absolute favorite is the St. Raphael Musical Bear. |
![]() | Plush, blue and white, musical, fully jointed bear. This 14" rose eyed, pot bellied bear with white leatherette paws, nose & belly button trimmed in gold . . . Archangel Bear St. Raphael ® , © 2004 MusicalBears.us |
There seems to be a bit of confusion concerning the celebration of St. Raphael's feast day. Depending upon which Catholic or Episcopalian web site you land on, the saint's day falls on October 21 or 24 or September 29 or some combination of these dates. Personally, I like the October 24th date, which is a Traditional Double Major Feast of Saint Raphael the Archangel. Wow! Some Catholic web sites inform that the individual feast days of the three archangelic saints mentioned in the Catholic Bible (Michael, Gabriel and Raphael) were dropped in favor of celebrating their feasts jointly. Could be, but then I wonder whether the liturgy used on Raphael's old feast day was also suppressed. The cult that claims to be always the same sure does change a lot. I suppose the careful Catholic who sincerely wishes to worship Raphael, with dulia of course, would be well advised to show up for Mass on all the dates, just to cover all the options. I have not been able to discover when archangel Raphael was canonized or who did the canonizing. Why one would canonize an archangel, or any angel for that matter, escapes me. When God created angels, He endowed them with supernatural powers. We know from Scripture (Job 1:6; 2:1; Revelation 5:1) that angels have ready access to the Throne of God and that they are immortal. Scriptures tell us that man was created a “little lower than the angels” (Psalms 8:4-8; Hebrews 2:6-8). Seems to me that converting a powerful being like an archangel into a Catholic saint amounts to adjusting the order of God's Creation. Oh, well. Who can truly understand the ways of Catholicism?
As I searched for an answer to the question of who canonized Raphael, I came across a Catholic USENET bulletin board moderated by a member of the Secular Franciscan Order. One of the participants asked how it could be that the Catholic Church considers Raphael, Michael and Gabriel to all be archangels when the only being mentioned in the Bible as having that status is Michael (Jude 1:9). Brother Rich's “It may be…” response speaks volumes concerning how some in Mother Church fill in the gaps in the inspired Scriptures:
“I do not know…” I am forced to acknowledge what is to me a rare example of theological honesty from a Catholic apologist, but it does not answer the question. Another honest and respected (by me, at least) Catholic theologian, journalist and writer named John Deedy provides insights into the multiple archangels issue. After citing several mentions of angels in the Scriptures, Deedy wrote:
At this point some readers who may not have grown up in the Catholic Church might be wondering where all those archangelic names came from. Michael and Gabriel were introduced to us in the Christian canonical Scriptures. Catholicism's version of the Scriptures includes the apocryphal book called Tobit, wherein one learns something of Raphael and his angelic responsibilities.
One hagiography tells us a bit more about Raphael, whose name means “God has healed.”
In her fantasies, the Catholic Church has attributed a number of healing roles and, of course, miracles to Raphael. Some might object to my referring to the miracles ascribed by Catholics to the healing ministry of Raphael as fantasies. They might even argue that these marvelous accounts have been confirmed by their church. The nature of such confirmations is suggested in these words from the Catholic Encyclopedia:
Did you notice how that works? First we see that “many commentators” lay the foundation for Raphael's role in Catholic Angelology by identifying him with the “angel of the Lord.” The mortar used in laying this foundation is the significance of the angel's name in Hebrew and the account of his labors in the apocryphal book of Tobit. I suppose this is a variant of the classic Catholic hermeneutic: He could have done it. He should have done it. Therefore, he did do it. And then it was “confirmed by the official Liturgy of the Church.” Give me a break! First, someone writes a fantastic account of the life and trials of a mythical being they call Tobias. Then, some folks in the upper levels of the then-apostasizing/once-Christian church include the fairy tale in a corrupted version of the Canon of Scripture. After that, commentators—no doubt Catholic—“discover” a link between the so-called archangel Raphael in the apocryphal book of Tobit and the angel of the Lord who stirred the waters at the pool Bethesda (John 5:1-4). Drawing on this tenuous connection linking apocryphal fantasy with biblical truth, the Catholic Church developed a Liturgy that, we are to believe, “confirms” what we are told was once a “conjecture” of early commentators. Marvelous. Mythical Saint Raphael has responsibilities that extend beyond burning fish livers and curing one disabled person per year at the pool Bethesda. Catholics and others who commune with spirits report a number of services Raphael performs for the living.
Catholic Heritage informs, in its March-April 1996 issue, that Raphael is considered to be the patron of light, love, health and joy. Raphael is a busy archangel. The Catholic Community Forum site informs that fictitious Raphael is patron of:
One might ask what is the difference between archangels and plain angels? A Catholic priest explains the difference:
Either that explanation is flawed, or Raphael is busily proclaiming “messages of supreme importance” while at the same time watching over happy meetings or curing someone's hemorrhoids. Am I wrong, or do writers of Catholic fantasy seem never to check for conflicts before publishing? Did you notice that Raphael is patron of guardian angels? I suppose that makes him sort of a guardian angel for guardian angels. Is Raphael an officer angel? Does he outrank enlisted angels? What are guardian angels? Do guardian angels exist? I can't answer the first two questions, but they are things to ponder. As to the latter two questions, priest Bertolucci has a wishy-washy Catholic answer:
Bertolucci and the Catholic Church may not be willing to infallibly define the existence and mission of guardian angels, but John Paul II at least is willing to take a determined stand on the matter:
Time and again, Catholic apologists argue with great fervor, that Catholics do not worship angels or other created beings. Yet how to explain the feast days and liturgies and special Masses dedicated to the archangels Michael, Gabriel and their fantasy peer Raphael? It's simple enough: they're just part of the strange gospel of Catholicism.
|
![]()
| Home | More Weird Stuff | Catholic Stuff | PTG Forum | ![]() |